[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Syslog] WGLC results : Syslog-MIB

Hi,
   The status of the draft is attached.

Glenn

Current draft: draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-09.txt ( September 3, 2006)

Comments:
     Editorial: None

     Closed Issues:
        1. Comment: Tables in the MIB to serve "groups of" syslog
           entities look different in focus from the other syslog
           protocols
           o Reference
              Re: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-mib document
              Tom Petch [2006/09/28 23:05]
           o Action: explained the usage and necessity of the tables to
              serve a group of syslog entities
           o Status: I think that the issue is closed.

     Open Issues:
        1. Comments: should anything on syslog-sign be added?
           o Reference
             RE: [Syslog] MIB document decision
             Alexander Clemm [2006/09/21 6:47]
           o Action: sent back the question to the WG
           o Status: The Syslog-sign related module may be added
             now or later ( in a separate document, after a few
             implementations and some experience). If the working
             group does want it to be in this document, we will do
             it.
     Glenn




David Harrington wrote:

Hi,

Will the editors of the WGLC'd documents please collect the comments
made for each of your documents into a single document, preferably
text, and indicate what was done in the document to address the issue
raised. 
Send the summary document to the chairs, with a copy of your current
in-process document containing the fixes thus far, so the chairs can
review your fixes. Once we have reviewed the fixes, we may ask for
some changes. Then we will have you publish a new I-D, which we will
send to the WG.

It would be good to separate the issues document into three sections:
1) purely editorial issues (spelling, grammar, etc.) 
2) Closed issues

Technical issues where consensus was obvious. For each issue, please
describe who raised the issue, and how the document was changed to
address the issue. The chairs will review the changes to make sure
they represent what the chairs consider to be WG consensus.

3) Open issues

Technical issues where the resolution is unclear. Please identify who
raised the issue. If you have a proposed fix, please describe it. The
chairs will review the issues and determine whether it is an issue
that needs resolution, whether your proposal is acceptable and in
keeping with WG consensus, or whether it needs to be discussed further
by the WG.
Thanks, 

David Harrington
dharrington@huawei.com dbharrington@comcast.net 
ietfdbh@comcast.net



_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog




_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog