[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TransportDomain. Was: Re: [Syslog] Submission ofdraft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-12.txt
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:39:50PM +0100, tom.petch wrote:
> You did indeed clarify the purpose of InetAddress and
> TransportAddress and that leaves me thinking that they do not fit
> very well here:-( Rather we have a choice of
> RFC3164 over UDP
> -protocol over UDP
> -protocol over TLS/TCP
> RFC3195 over BEEP
> (some of which can be signed) to enumerate
This is nothing new. It would help us more if you could tell us _how_
you think this should be done and why your approach will be superior
to those already put on the table here.
Thanks,
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder {International|Jacobs} University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany