Re: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-mib document

["tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>]

I have looked at this I-D and appreciate the increased explanation at the
beginning.  It leaves me clearer, but still thinking that this document steers a
different course to the other syslog ones, in its focus on a group of syslog
entities.  It's not that there cannot be more than one syslog entity running in
a given host, just that bundling them together into a table seems an artificial
complication; other syslog MIB modules I see are scalar in approach.

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net>
To: <syslog@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 4:44 PM
Subject: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-mib document


> Hi,
>
> This message officially starts the Syslog Working Group Last Call for
> the following document:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-09.tx
> t
>
> The Working Group Last Call for this document will end September 25.
>
> To help get these document reviewed throughly, we are seeking
> volunteers to review the documents for the following special reviews:
> 1) Spelling and grammar,
> 2) boilerplates and reference review,
> 3) security review
>
> The chairs want to see a minimum number of content reviews before we
> submit the documents to the IESG. If you review the document and it
> looks fine, please post a statement that you have reviewed and found
> the document acceptable. Obviously, if it does not look acceptable
> please identify your objections, preferably with suggested text that
> would make it acceptable.
>
> Thanks,
> David Harrington
> dharrington@huawei.com
> dbharrington@comcast.net
> ietfdbh@comcast.net
> co-chair, Syslog WG


_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog